House Vote on Contra Aid
- Share via
While I was delighted that Congress finally blocked aid to the Contras, I was very disappointed by the narrow scope of the debate in Congress. Contra supporters presented a lot of supposedly “factual” information which the opponents made no effort challenge.
Contra supporters predicted a “flood of refugees” if Contra aid failed. I heard nobody point out that millions of refugees are already flooding in. But they’re not coming from Nicaragua; they’re coming from El Salvador and Guatemala, the two countries where death squads carry out their own warped justice, and the rule of law is only a dream.
Why was this information missing from the congressional debate?
On the other side, Rep. W.J. (Billy) Tauzin (D-La.) actually described the idea that we should let Central Americans settle their own problems as a “strange argument.” Contra supporteres can’t possibly believe in democracy if they ignore the wishes of the very Central American presidents whose “democracies” they are praising.
MIGUEL MUNOZ
Los Angeles
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox twice per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
