Proper Spelling Fits Lawsuit to a ‘T’
- Share via
In a ruling likely to delight grammar school teachers, a state appellate court has decided that winning a lawsuit does not exempt an attorney from a higher duty: spelling properly.
The decision, handed down this week by the 4th District Court of Appeal in Santa Ana, upheld a lower court ruling that in effect set the price of the letter “t” at $50,000.
The roots of the case were a $50,000 judgment won by James Orr in 1978 against William Elliott in a lawsuit over the dissolution of their Santa Ana business partnership. When Orr’s attorney subsequently prepared legal papers to establish a lien against Elliott’s property, he left off the final “t” in the defendant’s name.
Thus, when Elliott sold a parcel of property in 1979 under his correctly spelled name, the title company found no record of a lien. Orr later found out the property had been sold and he filed suit to attach it. Although he eventually died, his widow continued the suit.
Agreeing with a lower court decision, the appeals court ruled that Orr had had his chance at the property, and that it had slipped away for good because of the misspelling.
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.