NCLE!
- Share via
I read Kenneth Turan’s little blurb about a new book called “Twenty-Six Friends” by Robert F. Blankholm (Dec. 2) with much interest because he claims to have learned that U is “our newest letter” of the alphabet, “not coming into general use until the 1660s.”
Now, I have not yet read “Twenty-Six Friends,” but I have taken a class in Old English (428-1100), where we learned how to translate the Anglo-Saxon language, a language which is incorporated into our present-day English and a language which, by the way, does include the letter U.
After all, what is Beowulf without a U? Beowlf ? And how could Chaucer have written “The Book of the Duchess” in 1370 or “Troilus and Criseyde” without the aforementioned vowel?
Also, wasn’t Shakespeare using the letter U before 1600? Or is his usage not considered to be “general”?
MILLICENT C. BORGES
LONG BEACH
More to Read
Sign up for our Book Club newsletter
Get the latest news, events and more from the Los Angeles Times Book Club, and help us get L.A. reading and talking.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.