JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS
- Share via
I was frankly puzzled to see a recent book of mine, “Vaslav Nijinsky: A Leap Into Madness,” described (by reviewer Alex Raksin, March 3) as “psychobiography.”
Nowhere in the text or on the dust jacket is this term used. The work is a straightforward biography, based on documents and eye-witness reports. Its purpose, as the preface makes clear, is to explore “the origins, manifestations, and treatment of Vaslav Nijinsky’s madness.”
I was happy to read that the reviewer felt “moved” by my descriptions of the great dancer’s mental illness. But I must object to his characterizing me as someone “trying to psychoanalyze a ‘patient’ who has never sat on his couch.”
I am not a psychoanalyst. Indeed, I take issue in this book with efforts that were made to psychoanalyze Nijinsky while he was psychotic.
As for my supposedly “taking literally the expression that Nijinsky ‘had feet like a bird,’ ” our reviewer should know that articles were published in Nijinsky’s lifetime claiming the bones of his feet to be those of an avian.
My search for X-rays was motivated, as was the rest of the research, by an urgent need--since no previous biographer had ever looked at his medical or psychiatric records--to separate fantasy from fact about Nijinsky’s charismatic career and devastating decline.
PETER OSTWALD MD, Medical Director, UC San Francisco, SAN FRANCISCO
More to Read
Sign up for our Book Club newsletter
Get the latest news, events and more from the Los Angeles Times Book Club, and help us get L.A. reading and talking.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.