Letters: Easily offended atheists
- Share via
Re “Prayers in public offices,” Editorial, May 21
Here we go again: A few people are offended by official meetings in Greece, N.Y., beginning with a prayer. Just how do such occurrences actually constitute a “law respecting an establishment of religion”?
I have never heard a good explanation of how the few activists who take offense to these things have actually had any rights infringed upon. In this case, there is no official religion and no way to enforce one.
To the best of my knowledge there is no constitutional right not to be offended. Just tune it out.
Mel Wolf
Burbank
As a 75-year-old taxpaying citizen who has served in the U.S. Army, and as an avowed atheist, I take issue with any manifestation of religion in any government office or proceeding. I keep my thoughts about religion to myself; is it asking believers too much to do the same?
If those who are devotees of any deity wish to be publicly acknowledged, then why not have a moment of silence for reflection without any specific reference to religion? Those who have a god could still pray, while others could contemplate as they choose.
It is proselytizing to atheists whenever a deity is given official recognition by a government body. Reverse this practice, or allow messages disavowing religions to be spoken.
Maurice Sparks
Los Angeles
ALSO:
Letters: Leimert Park’s light-rail win
Letters: Tracking twisters takes everyone
More to Read
A cure for the common opinion
Get thought-provoking perspectives with our weekly newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.